King Engine Bearings Chrysler/Mitsubishi 122ci 2.0L (Size 1.0) Rod Bearing Set

King Engine Bearings Chrysler/Mitsubishi 122ci 2.0L (Size 1.0) Rod Bearing Set

Marsoni

M251S

$40.87

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

King Engine Bearings Chrysler/Mitsubishi 122ci 2.0L (Size 1.0) Rod Bearing SetKing Engine Bearings Chrysler Mitsubishi 122ci 2. 0L (Size 1. 0) Rod Bearing SetThis Part Fits: Year Make Model Submodel 2000 Chrysler Cirrus LX 1995 1999 Chrysler Sebring LX 1995 1999 Dodge Avenger Base 1996 1999 Dodge Avenger ES 1998 1999,2001 2002 Dodge Neon ACR 1995 1997,2001 2002 Dodge Neon Base 2000 2002 Dodge Neon ES 1995 2000 Dodge Neon High Line 1998 1999,2001 2004 Dodge Neon R T 2002 Dodge Neon S 2001 2005 Dodge Neon SE 1995 1999 Dodge Neon

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your King Engine Bearings Chrysler/Mitsubishi 122ci 2.0L (Size 1.0) Rod Bearing Set orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your King Engine Bearings Chrysler/Mitsubishi 122ci 2.0L (Size 1.0) Rod Bearing Set ships.

Need Help?
Questions about King Engine Bearings Chrysler/Mitsubishi 122ci 2.0L (Size 1.0) Rod Bearing Set, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for King Engine Bearings Chrysler/Mitsubishi 122ci 2.0L (Size 1.0) Rod Bearing Set in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I do like the wallet but I hate the little extra flap inside it. It's very hard to get my license out of it. It makes the wallet way too thick. I just took it out and i don't use it. They should of just sewn 1 flap in there and the wallet would of been much thinner and still able to use the extra flap.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2026