1997 PRS Santana 1

Marsoni

M251S

$2550.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

1997 PRS Santana 1For your consideration, Garrett Park Guitars presents this 1997 PRS Santana 1. Beginning in 1995 PRS reproduced Carlos Santanas original PRS that Paul made for him in the early 1980s that literally put PRS on the map. It featured a Pre 85 body shape and headstock (with eagle inlay) a 24 1 4 scale, 24 frets with a 11. 5 radius fretboard, bird inlays, maple top with paua shell purfling, two Santana humbuckers, a tone knob and twin mini switches. This

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your 1997 PRS Santana 1 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your 1997 PRS Santana 1 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about 1997 PRS Santana 1, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for 1997 PRS Santana 1 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I got these briefs so recently that have washed just one pair so far. First off, these are very comfortable, the material is soft & bordering silky, good quality sewing. Wash well and minimal if any shrinkage. They do come a bit wrinkled from the dryer but hey, these are underwear and will go on smoothly. If it were a t-shirt, I would look sloppy. I feel the sizing is accurate. No rolling and these don't announce themselves under clothing. Planning on getting more of these boxers and replacing my old panties.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2026

Verified Purchase

Skurtzo

Lexington, US

★★★★★ 4

A little snug on the thighs

Size: Medium, Color: Multicoloured G (5-pack)

Super comfy, soft and thin. For reference, I'm 5'6", 135, athletic build. I bought medium. I almost returned them because I thought they were a bit too snug on my thighs, and my thighs are not large at all. I was concerned about panty lines under snug clothing. But, because they're thin, I figured they would probably stretch, so I kept them. So far, I've only worn them under a night shirt, but they're super comfortable and they dont ride up at all. Very nice, but if your thighs are a little thick, you probably won't like them.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2025

Verified Purchase

Shanna

Whiting, US

★★★★★ 5

Functional + Sexy

Size: Small, Color: Multicoloured E-(5-pack), Size: Small, Color: Multicoloured E-(5-pack)

Not only do these feel good, my husband can’t keep his hands off me. They fit so good and are soft. I change into these to sleep but also just use them as shorts to wear around the house. They’re comfortable and don’t slide around. I got a size small and I’m 100lbs.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2026

Verified Purchase

ClairY

Massapequa, US

★★★★★ 5

Finally!

Size: X-Large, Color: All Black D (5-pack)

Finally, comfortable underwear that don’t end up giving me a wedgie. I have a round booty and most cuts of underwear end up shifting as I walk and sit. The hem of the underwear comes right under my cheeks and the lightweight material ensures there’s no panty line and no shifting to where I don’t want them! I’m definitely purchasing more.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2026

Verified Purchase

Amazon Customer

Lowell, US

★★★★★ 3

Ehh

Size: Medium, Color: Multicoloured E-(5-pack)

Very thin, still comfy but very thin material. Super soft though. I've worn and washed and they have held up but I won't be repurchasing bc these are so thin

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2026